1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 1984 Toyota Blizzard
To start off, 1984 Toyota Blizzard is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 815 kg more than 1984 Toyota Blizzard.
Because 1984 Toyota Blizzard is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Toyota Blizzard will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow has automatic transmission and 1984 Toyota Blizzard has manual transmission. 1984 Toyota Blizzard will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 1984 Toyota Blizzard | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
Model | Silver Shadow | Blizzard |
Year Released | 1980 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 70 L |