1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2006 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 520 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Passat.
Because 2006 Volkswagen Passat is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Passat will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2006 Volkswagen Passat | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Volkswagen |
Model | Silver Shadow | Passat |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 3168 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 247 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 12.0:1 |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 238 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 68 L |