1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2008 Lamborghini Murcielago
To start off, 2008 Lamborghini Murcielago is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 500 kg more than 2008 Lamborghini Murcielago.
Because 2008 Lamborghini Murcielago is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Lamborghini Murcielago will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2008 Lamborghini Murcielago | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Lamborghini |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Murcielago |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 631 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.2:1 |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 340 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 1735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 21.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 100 L |
