1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2010 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2010 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2010 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Chrysler |
Model | Silver Shadow | Sebring |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 173 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 64 L |