1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 349 kg more than 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Land Rover |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 375 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 2584 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4973 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2035 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1877 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2878 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 104 L |
