1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2010 Lincoln MKX
To start off, 2010 Lincoln MKX is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 296 kg more than 2010 Lincoln MKX.
Because 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lincoln MKX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2010 Lincoln MKX | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Lincoln |
Model | Silver Shadow | MKX |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6749 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2206 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4737 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1715 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 72 L |