1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2011 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2011 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 413 kg more than 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2011 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Cadillac |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6749 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 403 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2206 kg | 2619 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5639 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1892 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3302 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 117 L |
