1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2012 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2012 Nissan Navara is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 203 kg more than 2012 Nissan Navara.
Because 2012 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2012 Nissan Navara | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Nissan |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Navara |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 16.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 2032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 80 L |
