1980 Saab 900 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Saab 900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Saab 900 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1980 Saab 900. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1980 Saab 900.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Saab 900, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Saab 900. (163 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Saab 900.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Saab 900 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Saab | Jaguar |
Model | 900 | XF |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2908 mm |