1980 Seat 131 vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat 131 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 755 kg more than 1980 Seat 131.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Seat 131. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1980 Seat 131 has manual transmission. 1980 Seat 131 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Seat 131 | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Seat | Ford |
Model | 131 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3010 mm |