1980 Seat Ritmo vs. 1970 Subaru FF-1
To start off, 1980 Seat Ritmo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Subaru FF-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Subaru FF-1 would be higher. At 1,266 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Subaru FF-1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Subaru FF-1 (68 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Subaru FF-1 should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Seat Ritmo weights approximately 180 kg more than 1970 Subaru FF-1.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Subaru FF-1 (99 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1970 Subaru FF-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Seat Ritmo | 1970 Subaru FF-1 | |
Make | Seat | Subaru |
Model | Ritmo | FF-1 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1197 cc | 1266 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2430 mm |