1980 Seat Ritmo vs. 1973 TVR M
To start off, 1980 Seat Ritmo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 TVR M would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Seat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Seat Ritmo weights approximately 65 kg more than 1973 TVR M.
Because 1973 TVR M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 TVR M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Seat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Seat Ritmo | 1973 TVR M | |
Make | Seat | TVR |
Model | Ritmo | M |
Year Released | 1980 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2290 mm |