1980 Seat Ritmo vs. 1974 Steyr 126
To start off, 1980 Seat Ritmo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Steyr 126. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Steyr 126 would be higher. At 1,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Seat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Seat Ritmo (63 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1974 Steyr 126. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Seat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1974 Steyr 126. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Seat Ritmo weights approximately 295 kg more than 1974 Steyr 126. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Steyr 126 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Steyr 126. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Seat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Seat Ritmo | 1974 Steyr 126 | |
Make | Seat | Steyr |
Model | Ritmo | 126 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1974 |
Engine Size | 1197 cc | 641 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 1850 mm |