1980 Seat Ritmo vs. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Seat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 144 kg more than 1980 Seat Ritmo.
Because 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Seat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Seat Ritmo | 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Seat | Toyota |
| Model | Ritmo | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1986 |
| Engine Size | 1714 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1910 mm |
