1980 Seat Ritmo vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Seat Ritmo | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Seat | Ford |
| Model | Ritmo | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1197 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2490 mm |
