1980 Seat Ritmo vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Seat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford C-Max (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 415 kg more than 1980 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford C-Max (240 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (98 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Seat Ritmo | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Seat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | C-Max |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2648 mm |