1980 Seat Ritmo vs. 2011 Holden Calais
To start off, 2011 Holden Calais is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 281 more horse power than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat Ritmo.
Because 2011 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Seat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 438 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat Ritmo. 2011 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1980 Seat Ritmo has manual transmission. 1980 Seat Ritmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Seat Ritmo | 2011 Holden Calais | |
Make | Seat | Holden |
Model | Ritmo | Calais |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1197 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 92 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |