1980 Seat Ritmo vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (98 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat Ritmo. 2011 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1980 Seat Ritmo has manual transmission. 1980 Seat Ritmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Seat Ritmo | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Seat | Holden |
| Model | Ritmo | Epica |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1714 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 98 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |
