1980 Skoda L vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Skoda L would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1980 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1980 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda CR-V weights approximately 653 kg more than 1980 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda CR-V (218 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Skoda L. (74 Nm). This means 2002 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Skoda L | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Skoda | Honda |
| Model | L | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1046 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 58 L |
