1980 Skoda L vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1980 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1980 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 725 kg more than 1980 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Skoda L | 2012 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Skoda | Mitsubishi |
Model | L | Colt |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1046 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9:01 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 47 L |