1980 Suzuki Cervo vs. 1981 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 1981 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 1,455 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Volkswagen Golf is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Volkswagen Golf weights approximately 375 kg more than 1980 Suzuki Cervo.
Because 1980 Suzuki Cervo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Suzuki Cervo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Suzuki Cervo | 1981 Volkswagen Golf | |
| Make | Suzuki | Volkswagen |
| Model | Cervo | Golf |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 539 cc | 1455 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 535 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2480 mm |
