1980 Suzuki Cervo vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 245 more horse power than 1980 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1980 Suzuki Cervo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 548 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Suzuki Cervo. (52 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Suzuki Cervo. 2011 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1980 Suzuki Cervo has manual transmission. 1980 Suzuki Cervo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Suzuki Cervo | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Suzuki | Jaguar |
Model | Cervo | XF |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 539 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 52 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2908 mm |