1980 Suzuki SJ 410 vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410.
Because 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Volvo 66 (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1976 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
| Model | SJ 410 | 66 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 970 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |
