1980 Toyota Celica vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda CR-V weights approximately 318 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Celica (215 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 1980 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Toyota Celica | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | Celica | CR-V |
Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2563 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 215 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2620 mm |