1980 Toyota Celica vs. 1997 Volvo S70
To start off, 1997 Volvo S70 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Volvo S70 (238 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Volvo S70 should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Volvo S70 weights approximately 318 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Volvo S70 (330 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1997 Volvo S70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Toyota Celica | 1997 Volvo S70 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Celica | S70 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2563 cc | 2319 cc |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2670 mm |
