1980 Toyota Celica vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,366 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Because 1980 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Celica. (175 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Toyota Celica | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Toyota | Holden |
Model | Celica | Cruze |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2366 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 175 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2685 mm |