1980 Toyota Celica vs. 2011 Ford E-250
To start off, 2011 Ford E-250 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1228 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford E-250 (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Toyota Celica | 2011 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Celica | E-250 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2563 cc | 4600 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 2410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 2154 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3505 mm |