1980 Toyota Celica vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,998 cc (24 cylinders), 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 750 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Because 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Toyota Celica | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Toyota | Mitsubishi |
Model | Celica | Outlander |
Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 24 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4665 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2670 mm |