1980 Toyota Starlet vs. 2013 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-V is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Starlet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Starlet would be higher. At 2,354 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda CR-V weights approximately 831 kg more than 1980 Toyota Starlet.
Because 1980 Toyota Starlet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Toyota Starlet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1980 Toyota Starlet has manual transmission. 1980 Toyota Starlet will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Toyota Starlet | 2013 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Toyota | Honda |
| Model | Starlet | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 993 cc | 2354 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 695 kg | 1526 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1644 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2620 mm |
