1980 Toyota Tercel vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (128 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Tercel. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Tercel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 650 kg more than 1980 Toyota Tercel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1980 Toyota Tercel has manual transmission. 1980 Toyota Tercel will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Toyota Tercel | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Tercel | S60 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 128 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2670 mm |
