1980 TVR 3000 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 TVR 3000 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 1980 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 TVR 3000 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | TVR | Zastava |
| Model | 3000 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 2994 cc | 1115 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2160 mm |
