1980 TVR 3000 vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1980 TVR 3000 has manual transmission. 1980 TVR 3000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 TVR 3000 | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | TVR | Holden |
| Model | 3000 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2994 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2700 mm |
