1980 Volvo 164 vs. 2011 Lincoln MKT
To start off, 2011 Lincoln MKT is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Lincoln MKT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Lincoln MKT (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Lincoln MKT should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 164.
Because 1980 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Lincoln MKT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Lincoln MKT (362 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 164. (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Lincoln MKT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Volvo 164 | 2011 Lincoln MKT | |
Make | Volvo | Lincoln |
Model | 164 | MKT |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2664 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 362 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 5273 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3350 mm | 2995 mm |