1980 Volvo 164 vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 164. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 164.
Because 2012 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 164. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Volvo 164 | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Volvo | Audi |
Model | 164 | A6 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2664 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 4915 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3350 mm | 2911 mm |