1980 Volvo 260 vs. 1969 Volvo 164
To start off, 1980 Volvo 260 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,976 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 260 (146 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1969 Volvo 164. (129 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1969 Volvo 164. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Volvo 164 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1980 Volvo 260.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 260 (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Volvo 164. (210 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Volvo 260 | 1969 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Volvo | Volvo |
Model | 260 | 164 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2664 cc | 2976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2730 mm |