1980 Volvo 260 vs. 2004 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2004 Pagani Zonda is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 394 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 120 kg more than 2004 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Pagani Zonda (750 Nm) has 520 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (230 Nm). This means 2004 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Volvo 260 | 2004 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Volvo | Pagani |
| Model | 260 | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 2848 cc | 7300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 547 HP |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 750 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2055 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1151 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2730 mm |
