1980 Volvo 260 vs. 2012 Opel Ampera
To start off, 2012 Opel Ampera is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Opel Ampera weights approximately 345 kg more than 1980 Volvo 260.
Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Ampera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Volvo 260 | 2012 Opel Ampera | |
| Make | Volvo | Opel |
| Model | 260 | Ampera |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2685 mm |
