1980 Volvo 66 vs. 2010 Renault Logan
To start off, 2010 Renault Logan is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Logan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Logan (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Logan should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Logan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Logan (160 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Logan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Volvo 66 | 2010 Renault Logan | |
Make | Volvo | Renault |
Model | 66 | Logan |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1287 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 17.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1750 mm |