1980 Zastava 1300 vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1980 Zastava 1300 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Zastava 1300 (59 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Zastava 1300 | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Zastava | Zastava |
| Model | 1300 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2010 mm |
