1980 Zastava 1300 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Zastava 1300 (59 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1983 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Zastava 1300 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Zastava | Zastava |
| Model | 1300 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2160 mm |
