1980 Zastava 1300 vs. 2006 Porsche Cayman

To start off, 2006 Porsche Cayman is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 3,392 cc, 2006 Porsche Cayman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Porsche Cayman (295 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Porsche Cayman should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Porsche Cayman weights approximately 455 kg more than 1980 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Porsche Cayman (340 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2006 Porsche Cayman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 1300. 2006 Porsche Cayman has automatic transmission and 1980 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1980 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Porsche Cayman will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: