1980 Zastava 132 vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 132. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 132.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Zastava 132. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 132. (143 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Zastava 132 | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Zastava | Citroen |
| Model | 132 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1756 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 143 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
