1980 Zastava 1500 vs. 2007 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2007 Ford Ecosport is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,479 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Zastava 1500 (74 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Zastava 1500 should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1980 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Zastava 1500 | 2007 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Zastava | Ford |
| Model | 1500 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2490 mm |
