1980 Zastava 750 vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 1997 Acura TL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura TL (176 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 750. (30 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 750.
Because 1980 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1980 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1980 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Zastava 750 | 1997 Acura TL | |
Make | Zastava | Acura |
Model | 750 | TL |
Year Released | 1980 | 1997 |
Engine Size | 767 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2840 mm |