1980 Zastava 750 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu

To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu (170 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 750. (30 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 909 kg more than 1980 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1980 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu (214 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 750. (51 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 750. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1980 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1980 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: