1980 ZIL 4104 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,695 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 ZIL 4104 (311 HP) has 244 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1980 ZIL 4104 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 ZIL 4104. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 ZIL 4104 has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 ZIL 4104 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 ZIL 4104 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | ZIL | Ford |
| Model | 4104 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7695 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5750 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2100 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2490 mm |
