1981 Abarth A 112 vs. 1964 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1981 Abarth A 112 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1405 kg more than 1981 Abarth A 112.
Because 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Abarth A 112 | 1964 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 963 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3300 mm |
