1981 Abarth A 112 vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 613 kg more than 1981 Abarth A 112.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1981 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1981 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Abarth A 112 | 2000 Ford Artic | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Artic |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3200 mm |