1981 Abarth A 112 vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 590 kg more than 1981 Abarth A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Abarth A 112 | 2000 Ford Puma | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | A 112 | Puma |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 963 cc | 1679 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2450 mm |
