1981 Abarth A 112 vs. 2004 Cadillac Catera
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Catera is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1981 Abarth A 112.
Because 2004 Cadillac Catera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac Catera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Cadillac Catera has automatic transmission and 1981 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1981 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Cadillac Catera will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Abarth A 112 | 2004 Cadillac Catera | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | A 112 | Catera |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 2962 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2940 mm |